In
the New York Times editorial article,
"Donald Trump Jr. and the Culture of Dishonesty" the author argues
that Americans should distrust Trump and Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr. The
author of the article is targeting all Americans and making them question if
they believe Trump and his administration are trustworthy. The author formulates
the argument by using rhetorical questions and an appeal to the emotions. The author
uses a rhetorical question, “If a culture of dishonesty takes root in an
administration, how can Americans believe anything its officials say?” (The
Editorial Board, “Donald Trump Jr and the Culture of Dishonesty”) to make
Americans question the validity of the Trump administration. By using a
rhetorical question, it makes Americans think about their believes. Through the
use of a rhetorical question, it strengths the authors argument. In addition, the
author also uses an appeal to the emotions through informal diction which strengthens
the author’s argument. The author claims that since Trump has been in office “Trump
has compiled a record of dishonesty- ranging from casual misstatements to
flat-out lies” (Editorial Board, “Donald Trump Jr and the Culture of Dishonesty”).
The use of the informal words “flat out lies” makes the reader unable to
justify that Trump is dishonesty. Thus, it makes the reader feel that there is
no other way to justify Trump’s actions. Therefore, it makes the reader lose
credibility in the Trump administration. The author appears to be credible by
using logic such as rhetorical questions and an appeal to the emotions. In
conclusion, the use of a rhetorical question and an appeal to the emotions the
author is successful in proving his argument that the Trump administration is untrustworthy.
No comments:
Post a Comment